X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with ESMTP id 1023936 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:50:32 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm67aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050627214947.YMU2463.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm67aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:49:47 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm67aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050627214946.URZ11273.ibm67aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:49:46 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: NPG + use in aircraft?? Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:49:48 -0500 Message-ID: <000301c57b62$23844690$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C57B38.3AAE3E90" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C57B38.3AAE3E90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rusty; can you quantify this statement:=20 =20 How much more does it cost?=20 =20 Over here, it's about $20/gallon plus shipping, which is considerably = more than normal antifreeze, and waaaaay more than distilled water. For cost estimates, you'd be better off to look this up from a local supplier, or contact Evan's about price and shipping down under. =20 What percentage poorer, is it in heat removal efficiency There was some percentage given for heat transfer compared to water, but = I don't recall what it was. Evan's claims that the lack of hot spot = boiling will actually make Evan's more efficient than it would otherwise seem. Basically, you won't know until you try, and even then, you may not = know. =20 =20 Dave and I both installed it at the same time we made significant = changes to the cooling system, so neither of us can say exactly what effect it had. Hopefully, someone will install it without changing anything else, and = let us know. =20 =20 Cheers, Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C57B38.3AAE3E90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Rusty; can you quantify this statement: 
 
 How much more does it = cost? 
 
Over here,=20 it's about $20/gallon plus shipping, which is considerably more than = normal=20 antifreeze, and waaaaay more than distilled water.  For cost=20 estimates, you'd be better off to look this up from a local = supplier,=20 or contact Evan's about price and shipping down under. =20   

What percentage poorer, is it in heat = removal=20 efficiency

There was some percentage given = for heat transfer=20 compared to water, but I don't recall what it was.  Evan's claims = that the=20 lack of hot spot boiling will actually make Evan's more efficient = than it=20 would otherwise seem.  Basically, you won't know until you = try, and=20 even then, you may not know.  
 
Dave and I=20 both installed it at the same time we made significant changes to the = cooling=20 system, so neither of us can say exactly what effect it had.  = Hopefully,=20 someone will install it without changing anything else, and let us=20 know.   
 
Cheers,
Rusty
------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C57B38.3AAE3E90--