X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au ([210.50.76.196] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with ESMTP id 1023921 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:38:19 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=210.50.76.196; envelope-from=daval@iprimus.com.au Received: from [192.168.1.8] (211.26.28.186) by smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.2.060.1) id 42A0B1C10079F984 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 07:37:30 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--132875303 Message-Id: From: david mccandless Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NPG + use in aircraft?? Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 05:37:25 +0800 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) --Apple-Mail-1--132875303 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Rusty; can you quantify this statement: How much more does it cost? What percentage poorer, is it in heat removal efficiency > > The=A0down side is the cost, and the fact that it doesn't transfer = heat=20 > as effectively as traditional EG/water mix.=A0 Your temps will almost=20= > certainly go up some, but at least you won't=A0boil over.=A0=A0=A0=A0 > =A0= --Apple-Mail-1--132875303 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Rusty; can you quantify this statement: How much more does it cost? What percentage poorer, is it in heat removal efficiency = ArialFFFF,0000,0000The=A0down side is the cost, and the fact that it doesn't transfer heat as effectively as traditional EG/water mix.=A0 Your temps will almost certainly go up some, but at least you won't=A0boil = over.=A0=A0=A0=A0 = Arial=A0= --Apple-Mail-1--132875303--