X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.220] (HELO priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with ESMTP id 1023820 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:30:25 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=199.185.220.220; envelope-from=echolakeresort@telus.net Received: from boucher-oddle24 ([207.194.127.114]) by priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id <20050627202938.DGOL10863.priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net@boucher-oddle24> for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:29:38 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <42C061AD.000017.03336@BOUCHER-ODDLE24> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:29:33 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time) Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_9LFRO2Q1VA4000000000" X-Mailer: IncrediMail (3001609) From: "Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)" References: To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NPG + use in aircraft?? X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 --------------Boundary-00=_9LFRO2Q1VA4000000000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok Rusty =0D My point is that the 13b can't handle the same amount of heat as a piston engine without "O" ring seal damage. Is that better??=0D Georges B. =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Date: 06/27/05 13:23:59=0D To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: NPG + use in aircraft??=0D =0D "boiling removes heat" I have a hard time understanding that quote. =0D I was usually unconscious and drooling during chemistry class, so you'll have to ask someone who actually enjoyed it, and paid attention. Seems l= ike we have a couple of those sickos around here :-)=0D The one disadvantage I see in the 13b is that it can't handle the potenti= al higher boiling point of PG.=0D Would any common auto engine be happy with 350 degree coolant? I guess I never would have figured that would be good for them either. =0D Rusty (drool free at the moment)=0D =0D =20 --------------Boundary-00=_9LFRO2Q1VA4000000000 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok Rusty
My point is that the 13b can't handle the same amount of heat as a p= iston engine without "O" ring seal damage. Is that better??
Georges B. 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 06/27/05 13:= 23:59
Subject: [FlyRotar= y] Re: NPG + use in aircraft??
 

"boiling removes heat" I have a hard time understanding= that quote.

I was usually unconscious and = drooling during chemistry class, so you'll have to ask someone who a= ctually enjoyed it, and paid attention.  Seems like we have a couple= of those sickos around here :-)

The one disadvantage I see in the 13b is that it can't = handle the potential higher boiling point of PG.

Would any c= ommon auto engine be happy with 350 degree coolant?  I guess I = never would have figured that would be good for them either.

Rusty (drool free at the moment)

&nbs= p;

 
--------------Boundary-00=_9LFRO2Q1VA4000000000--