X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from m12.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with SMTP id 1022945 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:35:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.30.75; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com Received: from m12.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m12.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABBM93C5ABVJJKA for (sender ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:34:51 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkPGwvPH9XJqBY69n45os4JL53W7GhxqXoA== Received: (from alwick@juno.com) by m12.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id KWHF932R; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:34:07 PDT To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:56:10 -0700 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak Message-ID: <20050627.043353.2556.4.alwick@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.33 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 4-9,11-275 From: al p wick X-ContentStamp: 107:53:3515377371 X-MAIL-INFO:524040f500308d203020208d208dc195197180c0601560c03dbd6140b100117504f50030b1f5a52da945d59589458935205420c420398d89799565fde1a4b09405052951a0600180c0e929e5e9d91d9d64fde98414d0345184fd64842d8419e4b1cd7d0555296529415110d935741001a075b1709139f9b079a4b070a1dda174f520eda4214089edf5950c957994405495a1cdcd657d6465fd6405411919a0952439a4b579f9d0d4d4d19934ddc06d1455bdc46dfd656549c49d80c9e490849059d9a4247de4adf0c0e0e919e969f9e590bd01a0d961494904712df0b00d7530d94040 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m12.lax.untd.com|alwick@juno.com Sorry Ian, I was not familiar with those types of cooling systems. I thought I was deviating from standard practice and that always sends up warning flag. I didn't want to recommend cup-o-air and ignore the "deviation". From your reports, it sounds like some mfg's use cup-o-air and others definitely don't. Thanks for setting me straight. -al wick On Mon, 27 Jun 2005 01:20:30 -0400 "Ian Dewhirst" writes: > Al, I am going to bow out of this one. I started out by trying to > explain > why your cup of air was a good idea by telling you that you are not > alone in > that strategy, every auto manufacturer in the world relies on a "cup > of > air", "vapor cushion", "spring", whatever. You don't think that is > the case > which is fine by me, just keep that cup of air in there ;-) > > I came by my info honestly, from having owned a garage and > repairing > automobiles for a living. I have worked on at least 200 different > makes and > models, I kept my eyes open. I think George came by his knowledge > the same > way. > > Chers -- Ian > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft > [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > Behalf Of al p wick > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 11:57 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak > > > If you find any info to support your points, let me know will you? > What > do you mean by "you can't have pressure without a spring"? Why do > you > assume coolant is boiled? Why does coolant pushed out have to result > in > vapor? > > I always thought that pressure always increased in closed systems > when > you heat a fluid. This because the molecules get excited and move > farther > apart. The volume tries to increase, but can't due to sys being > closed, > so pressure must rise. > > Here's another cool site...or hot and cool site. > > http://science.howstuffworks.com/stirling-engine1.htm > > > -al wick > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:21:55 -0400 "Ian Dewhirst" > > writes: > > Sorry Al, I think you are incorrect on the no vapor theory. While > it > > is > > true that in many big three cooling solutions the level in the > > overflow > > reservoir will change as the engine is cycled from cold to hot > back > > to cold > > again, the cooling system is never all liquid. There has to be > > vapor > > before you start. I am sure that we both agree on the following > > points: An > > automobile cooling system needs to be pressurized to operate > above > > the > > boiling point of water. You can't have pressure without a spring > in > > a > > closed system. The spring used is compressed vapor. If you > don't > > start out > > with vapor, you will push out coolant until you create some > vapor, > > this > > vapour is the result of coolant that has boiled in the block > > somewhere. A > > rad cap is a pressure relief device not an accumulator; it is > open > > or > > closed. For a spring loaded to opperate as an accumulator you > need > > an > > unlimited supply of coolant/air/oil/etc. to flow through at a > rate > > high > > enough that you can create back pressure, much like the spring > > loaded > > pressure regulator on an engine lubrication system. > > > > Your radiator may look like it is full but the filler neck likely > > extends > > down past the top of the tank or it is on the side of in the case > of > > a cross > > flow radiator, either way the cooling system is not 100% liquid > > filled. > > > > Since we are all building hybrid cooling systems, we need to > > remember to > > leave some vapour in the system ( as you are doing ) to make sure > > that we > > are operating with a pressurized system "before" we start to > expel > > coolant > > from the system. > > > > George mentioned the fact that a good many vehicles have systems > > that never > > vent coolant through the cap unless over heating, I would agree > with > > him > > that this is the best solution; usually it involves a combination > > expansion > > tank / swirl pot and a pressure cap that is vented to the ground. > > Cheers - > > Ian > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rotary motors in aircraft > > [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > > Behalf Of al p wick > > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:02 PM > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak > > > > > > Actually, I think the opposite is true. I understand the auto > > approach is > > to NOT have any air in the cooling system. I don't recall the > > details of > > their reasoning. In my experience, the safety advantage of > cup-o-air > > is > > much more significant. > > BTW, it's probably more like 2 cups. The goal is to have enough > air > > cushion to prevent pressure from reaching cap rating. When you > > include > > coolant temp, fluid level, and pressure info, it really improves > > your > > understanding of how your system is behaving. > > > > If you ever open your car radiator and find air at top, it > indicates > > a > > problem with your cooling system. > > > > > > > > -al wick > > Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock > Subaru > > 2.5 > > N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon > > Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel > design > > info: > > http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html > > > > > > > > On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:15:14 -0400 "Ian Dewhirst" > > > > writes: > > > Al, your experience with the value of having an air cushion is > > > supported by > > > every automotive cooling system that I have ever seen (many). > > > Typically > > > autos use either a pressure cap and expansion tank that is not > > > filled to the > > > top, or an overflow bottle into which coolant is expelled and > > > recovered. I > > > get the impression that some people assume that these overflow > > style > > > systems > > > contain no vapour when cold, I don't think that assumption is > > > correct. The > > > overflow systems all have expansion capacity built into the top > > of > > > the > > > radiator, or some other part of the cooling system they are > never > > > completely > > > filled with coolant. The bigger the cooling system the greater > > the > > > volume > > > of vapour stored cold. > > > > > > -- Ian > > > > > > (GM, Chrysler, and Ford are not trying to piss you off with > those > > > side > > > mounted radiator caps.. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rotary motors in aircraft > > > [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > > > Behalf Of al p wick > > > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 11:58 AM > > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Coolant Leak > > > > > > > > > My focus is on flight safety. I found great value to having > appx. > > 1 > > > cup > > > of air at the top of my cooling system.... > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > > >> Archive: > http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > > > > -al wick > Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru > 2.5 > N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon > Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design > info: > http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > -al wick Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5 N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info: http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html