X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with ESMTP id 1020378 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:40:30 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.116; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from 204.127.135.75 ([204.127.135.75]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2005062415394311200a90q8e>; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:39:43 +0000 Received: from [209.247.222.87] by 204.127.135.75; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:39:42 +0000 From: keltro@att.net (Kelly Troyer) To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: Forward from Mistral Engines SA Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:39:42 +0000 Message-Id: <062420051539.22838.42BC293E0006F3A7000059362160466648019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Feb 14 2005) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22838_1119627582_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22838_1119627582_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Bill, Their website claims 190 hp for the NA engine. -- Kelly Troyer Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 -------------- Original message from Bill Dube : -------------- > Looking at the photos, they seem to have combined the secondary > ports with the outer primary ports. The timing on these ports is quite > different. I would think that you would want to keep them separate to > maximize the ram effect of the secondary port. > > I'm no expert, so I could be missing some key point. > > Bill Dube' > > What sort of HP are engines making with these manifolds? --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22838_1119627582_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Bill,
  Their website claims 190 hp for the NA engine.
--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2




-------------- Original message from Bill Dube <bdube@al.noaa.gov>: --------------


> Looking at the photos, they seem to have combined the secondary
> ports with the outer primary ports. The timing on these ports is quite
> different. I would think that you would want to keep them separate to
> maximize the ram effect of the secondary port.
>
> I'm no expert, so I could be missing some key point.
>
> Bill Dube'
>
> What sort of HP are engines making with these manifolds?
--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_22838_1119627582_0--