X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [204.127.202.64] (HELO sccrmhc13.comcast.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1005643 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:14:15 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.64; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from office5 (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <20050617221251016000m3p6e>; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 22:12:57 +0000 Message-ID: <013301c57389$a8625ea0$057ba8c0@farr.com> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Brake Fluid Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:12:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 if you fellows really think that using this or that approved brake fluid in something on an experimental aircraft with a rotary engine is going to help you get some sympathy, much less help you find liability where there is most likely none, go ahead, feel better. Remember, I said non certificated aircraft. jofarr, soddy tn >> ----- Original Message ----- From: Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher) IMO FWIW the aircraft industry is sticking to the old fluid & seal material because they gun shy. Each time they make an improvement there is an accident they sued & the change is blamed. Georges B. -------Original Message-------From: Rotary motors in aircraft I have to agree with Ernest on this one. Well I can surely agree with you guys on the insurance angle. The whole deal smacks of Buracratic BS though. <<