X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.223] (HELO priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1005570 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:29:35 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=199.185.220.223; envelope-from=echolakeresort@telus.net Received: from boucher-oddle24 ([207.194.127.69]) by priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id <20050617202848.QVOO2462.priv-edtnes28.telusplanet.net@boucher-oddle24> for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:28:48 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <42B33255.000010.03028@BOUCHER-ODDLE24> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:28:05 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time) Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_TUW8N0X1VA4000000000" X-Mailer: IncrediMail (3001609) From: "Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)" References: To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Brake Fluid X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 --------------Boundary-00=_TUW8N0X1VA4000000000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable IMO FWIW the aircraft industry is sticking to the old fluid & seal materi= al because they gun shy. Each time they make an improvement there is an accident they sued & the change is blamed.=0D Georges B. =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Date: 06/17/05 13:04:47=0D To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Brake Fluid=0D =0D I have to agree with Ernest on this one.=0D After much research I found that Cleveland brakes have a similar warning that their seals are compatible with red aircraft fluid (Mil-H-5606).=0D Originally I thought that any of the modern, high-tech brake fluids woul= d be better but after reading the instructions I changed my mind and decide= d to use what is known to work. If you use other than what is specified and there is a failure, you can't blame the brake supplier and it may even invalidate your insurance (if you can get insurance that is).=0D Jim=0D =0D Well I can surely agree with you guys on the insurance angle. The whole d= eal smacks of Buracratic BS though.=0D Bill=0D =20 --------------Boundary-00=_TUW8N0X1VA4000000000 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
IMO FWIW the aircraft industry is sticking to the old flui= d & seal material because they gun shy. Each time they make an i= mprovement there is an accident they sued & the change is blamed= =2E
Georges B. 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 06/17/05 13:= 04:47
Subject: [FlyRotar= y] Re: Brake Fluid
 
I have to agree with Ernest on this one.
After much research I found that Cleveland brakes have a similar war= ning that their seals are compatible with red aircraft fluid (Mil-H-= 5606).
 Originally I thought that any of the modern, high-tech brake f= luids would be better but after reading the instructions I changed my min= d and decided to use what is known to work. If you use other than what is= specified and there is a failure, you can't blame the brake supplier and= it may even invalidate your insurance (if you can get insurance that is)= =2E
Jim
 
Well I can surely agree with you guys on the insurance angle. The wh= ole deal smacks of Buracratic BS though.
Bill
 
--------------Boundary-00=_TUW8N0X1VA4000000000--