Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.72; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:08:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Manifold Thoughts - 6 to 4 ports
From: Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message-ID: <BED45D05.26B3%atlasyts@bellsouth.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-1001521@logan.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit


> That's a seems like a little bit more of a R&D program than I want to
> take on right now, George (and I'm fully aware that the difficulty may
> be more perception than reality).  I'm confident that I can handle a
> porting job, as I've had to do a lot of metal 'sculpturing' to fit all
> these tubes together.  Now, it's just a question of what to cut away for me.
> 
> I believe the same thing is said about a PP that is said about what I
> think I'd like to do...rough idle and no low-end power.  Am I correct
> that the solution is short runners with a closely fitted throttle?


I'm already thinking of a PP engine. By the looks of it from PL's tests it
makes about the same power as turbo, without the weight and more simple?
I don't know how it will compare at altitude?
Buly