X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.72] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 1001533 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:04:04 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.72; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm68aec.bellsouth.net ([67.32.133.236]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050614140318.QLYN26489.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm68aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:03:18 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.102] (really [67.32.133.236]) by ibm68aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050614140317.NVWU29052.ibm68aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.2.102]> for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:03:17 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:03:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] fuel pump mounting From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 6/14/05 9:13 AM, "Joseph M Berki" wrote: > If you use the electric fuel pumps like Tracy is using what does the inlet > side look like (plumbing)? Does the pump have any suction on the > inlet? Should it be purely gravity fed? Can the inlet be fed from a tube > that goes into a tank close to the bottom 1.5" but is bent down in a 90 > degree bend? The sump is lower than the tanks and the pumps would be at the > level of the bottom of the sump. My concern is how much of a "hump" in the > plumbing will the pump tolerate? Thanks for any help. > > Joe Berki > Limo EZ > Joe, in my system I avoided "humps". Everything after the sumps is below sump level, so the pump inlets always see some pressure. In flight this pressure is increased somewhat by the air pressure on top of the tank created by the vents. I use 3/8" aluminum tubing up-to the large canister filter and 6-port selector valve. I don't understand why you need extra sump tank in a Cozy? Bulent