X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <dale.r@cox.net>
Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4)
  with ESMTP id 1000391 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:31:06 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.27; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net
Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP
          id <20050613163019.QKJY550.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:30:19 -0400
X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528)
From: Dale Rogers <dale.r@cox.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: More RX-8 Manifold Thoughts
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:30:19 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20050613163019.QKJY550.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net>

Ernest,

   You wrote:

> Bill, if you're going to eliminate all the 'stuff' and the port will 
> always be open, why not remove the wall between the side ports and make 
> them one? 

   After reading Paul Yaw's site, specifically this page:

http://www.yawpower.com/Flow%20Testing.html

I wouldn't want to do that without something to verify the 
flow characteristics.  I was amazed at how easy is was to 
make things worse by making them bigger.

Dale R.