Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <42AD9587.3080100@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:17:43 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] John's Failed ECU & how do we make sure it doesn't
 happen again.
References: <list-992515@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-992515@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Michael LaFleur wrote:

>I'm suprised that I hevn't heard a peep from anybody
>regarding the incorrect part in John's ECU. Is it just
>enough that it was found? How do we know it won't
>happen again? We know what the interim action is
>(recall and rework of current stock)
>  
>

Michael, when you order assembly in quantities of 1,000/wk, you have the 
power to implement policies and procedures upon a supplier.  That power 
goes away when your ordering in quantites of 10 or 100 per quarter or 
year.  Just how big do you think the market is for control units for 
alternative airplane engines?

-- 
         ,|"|"|,                                    |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----        Dyke Delta         |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |