X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop: No license found, only first 5 messages were scanned Return-Path: Received: from web81207.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with SMTP id 993546 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:53:11 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.37.180; envelope-from=mike.lafleur@sbcglobal.net Received: (qmail 80625 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jun 2005 02:52:22 -0000 Message-ID: <20050613025222.80623.qmail@web81207.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.21.36.78] by web81207.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:52:22 PDT Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:52:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael LaFleur Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] normalized supercharger? Was Re: Is common sense dead (rant mode on) To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Oops, I've been called out! Having just come up with the idea lately, I hadn't much about the installation. My inclination would be to electronically control the wategate and have a popoff valve set a a couple psi over 1 atm. Mike L. --- Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote: > I will have a normalized Renesis, supercharged. > > Hi Mike, > > How were you planning to normalize with the > supercharger? > > I'm planning to put either a supercharger (what I'd > prefer), or another > turbo (shut up John ) on the RV-3, somewhere down > the road. One of the > drawbacks to the supercharger is the lack of boost > control. I asked the ATI > guys about controlling the boost via a valve on the > outlet of the blower, > but they said not to do that because it was bad to > unload the blower. > > You can certainly control boost via throttle > opening, and perhaps you can > even do it via engine computer almost like a sort of > rev limit. What's your > plan? > > Cheers, > Rusty (no flying today, due to work that sucks) > > > > > > > > > > >