X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 990282 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:38:31 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm66aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050609193740.EZAS8541.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm66aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:37:40 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm66aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050609193738.WNWJ5308.ibm66aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:37:38 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 Urgent AD Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:37:39 -0500 Message-ID: <005e01c56d2a$b2513e50$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005F_01C56D00.C97B3650" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005F_01C56D00.C97B3650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was researching the failure on John Slades EC2 and found some = disturbing things. =20 =20 Nice catch Tracy, and I guess we should thank the guy under the big dark cloud for blowing this up for us :-) =20 =20 Can you recall anything about the timeframe of these changes. For = example, were any of these changes made before the redesign from square box to rectangular box?=20 =20 As you could have guessed, my latest unit SN-509 (in the garage) has the = bad choke. I'll have to check the several year old square box unit in the plane, but I just hate to pull that top skin off without an EM-2 chip to install while I'm in there :-) =20 =20 Could you go ahead and send me one choke for SN-509, and at least I'll = have it in hand when tear the plane apart to check the older EC-2?. I'm = guessing I won't need one, but at least I'd have one in hand if it does, and I = could put it back together, and wait for a second choke for the newer unit. =20 =20 Thanks, Rusty (never going to retire if it means having as much fun as Tracy and = Ed) =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_005F_01C56D00.C97B3650 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I was researching the failure on John Slades EC2 = and found=20 some disturbing things.   
 
Nice catch Tracy,=20 and I guess we should thank the guy under the = big dark cloud for=20 blowing this up for us :-)  
 
Can=20 you recall anything about the timeframe of these = changes.  For=20 example, were any of these changes made before the redesign=20 from square box to rectangular box? 
 
As you could have=20 guessed, my latest unit SN-509 (in the garage) has the bad=20 choke.   I'll have to check the several year old square box = unit in=20 the plane, but I just hate to pull that top skin off without an EM-2 = chip to=20 install while I'm in there  :-)  
 
Could you go=20 ahead and send me one choke for SN-509, and at least I'll have it in = hand when=20 tear the plane apart to check the older EC-2?.  I'm guessing I = won't need=20 one, but at least I'd have one in hand if it does, and I could put it = back=20 together, and wait for a second choke for the newer=20 unit.   
 
Thanks,
Rusty (never=20 going to retire if it means having as much fun as Tracy and=20 Ed)
 
 
 
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_005F_01C56D00.C97B3650--