X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.200] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 989638 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:02:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.162.200; envelope-from=wdleonard@gmail.com Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 34so453489nzf for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:02:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZR+JgTBENExN/NQlM9gO/z4xmB2BPaQ8HeqVCWSZVEJQmGGrNmNn72Zgjlew91EhoaVNDnrWwmbX2LLcD+lB2XP7DAcl0DYmPbTbLPbUWIE8+eDWvuNwyiuG7hdQ6Q5ue7/nuj06LnqDfl9tu2azdlAlckWSq17tw3CSVe2gBI8= Received: by 10.36.19.20 with SMTP id 20mr150182nzs; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.9.4 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1c23473f05060822021ac965e1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:02:12 -0700 From: David Leonard Reply-To: David Leonard To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Very strange problem after installing new turbo In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_134_26670570.1118293332805" References: ------=_Part_134_26670570.1118293332805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 6/8/05, David Staten wrote:=20 >=20 > Is the fuel pump capable of supporting the needed pressure ABOVE the boos= t=20 > level? Perhaps this is a fuel pressure induced sag caused by too little= =20 > "RELATIVE" pressure above the deck pressure. >=20 > Just speculation, not based on experience > Dave Another good guess. Yes, very capable. I demonstrated that to my self back= =20 when my fuel pressure gauge was working properly they could support in=20 excess of 80 PSI with adequate flow. During the test today I tried running= =20 just the 2nd pump, then both together. No change.=20 Also, worked well in the past with the other turbo pulling 38-40"MAP. The more I think about, the detonation issue because of the advanced timin= g=20 is starting to make some sense. Will go retard the timing and see what I=20 get. --=20 Dave Leonard (feeling a little retarded myself) Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html http://members.aol.com/vp4skydoc/index.html ------=_Part_134_26670570.1118293332805 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

On 6/8/05, D= avid Staten <Dastaten@eart= hlink.net> wrote:
Is the fuel pump capable of supp= orting the needed pressure ABOVE the boost level? Perhaps this is a fuel pr= essure induced sag caused by too little "RELATIVE" pressure above= the deck pressure.
 
Just speculation, not based on experience
Dave
 
Another good guess.  Yes, very capable.  I demonstrated that= to my self back when my fuel pressure gauge was working properly they coul= d support in excess of 80 PSI with adequate flow.  During the test tod= ay I tried running just the 2nd pump, then both together.  No change.= =20
 
Also, worked well in the past with the other turbo pulling 38-40"= MAP.
 
The more I think about, the detonation issue because of the advanced t= iming is starting to make some sense.  Will go retard the timing and s= ee what I get.
 
--
Dave Leonard (feeling a little retarded myself)
Turbo Rotary= RV-6 N4VY
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html
http://members.aol.com/vp4skydoc/index.html
------=_Part_134_26670570.1118293332805--