Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.98.204.64; envelope-from=bob@bob-white.com
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:05:21 -0600
From: Bob White <bob@bob-white.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: [valid] [FlyRotary] Re: [Fwd: COZY: Rotary
 risks]
Message-Id: <20050603190521.0dd2d5bf.bob@bob-white.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-983581@logan.com>
References: <list-983581@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Jim,

Wow!  I spend the aftgernoon running errands and there's 43 messages to
read.

Jim is there any chance you could at least put a little space around
your replies? I'm interested in everything you say, but sometimes it's
hard to figure out what it is. :)  It could just be my email program.
You seem to be using html, but I'm not getting an html mime type

It didn't sound like Al agreed (pushing the limit), but now that he's on
the list we will find out.  

I'm not planning on avoiding rpm > 6000.  I believe Tracy started out
that way because he was being conservative.  I had to cancel my order
for the 2.17:1 redrive when he announced the 2.85:1.

Sorry about that [valid] in the subject line.  I started using a new
spam filter and didn't know it was going to do that to me.  Fixed!

Quote from another email list especially for you HTML email guys:
"I don't understand that attitude.  Don't we want email that has dancing
 bears, cute little videos, musical tunes, animated waving hands, sixty
 fonts, and looks like it's been done with crayolas? Good grief, man,
 think like a three year old!"
                                   -- Norm Reitzel discussing HTML email

I have no idea who Norm Reitzel is, and I know you guys mainly want
colored fonts. :)

Bob W. (No more contentious remarks today.)

On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:05:38 -0500
Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net> wrote:

> Bob White wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> 
(edited for clarity to response)
> I agree with the argument that recprocating engines are pushing closer to the limit than the rotary at
> high RPM, . . . . ..  

We're ALL agreed on that.  Which might be why Al doesn't run his Soob
much past 4500 rpm.  BTW, why  do so many of US avoid rpm > 6000 on
rotarys?

-- 
http://www.bob-white.com
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)