X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.224] (HELO priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 982037 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 10:54:14 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=199.185.220.224; envelope-from=echolakeresort@telus.net Received: from [207.194.26.209] by priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050602145325.FHDY3443.priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net@[207.194.26.209]> for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:53:25 -0600 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.322 [267.3.0]); Thu, 02 Jun 2005 07:53:23 -0700 Message-Id: <429F1D5F.000001.02664@BOUCHER-ODDLE24> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:53:19 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail (3001609) From: "Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)" References: To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: [Fwd: COZY: Rotary risks] X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-429F1D631346=======" --=======AVGMAIL-429F1D631346======= Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_VCPGQL80000000000000" --------------Boundary-00=_VCPGQL80000000000000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: Al Wick=0D The information on his Website is sensible, what he posted on our site do= esn t seem to be written by the same guy! Maybe he was having a bad day, annalists usually give a reason for there findings.=0D Georges B.=0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Date: 06/02/05 06:14:49=0D To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: [Fwd: COZY: Rotary risks]=0D =0D I think you folks are being to hard on Al Wick. He apparently=0D makes his living doing risk analysis; and like the workman=0D who has only one tool - say, a hammer - everything looks=0D like a nail. The problem with his analysis is the same as=0D with all statistical analysis: (1) how one selects the data=0D to be used, (2) grouping unlike samples together, and (3)=0D generalizing from too small a sample.=0D =0D Since - at this point - every installation is in some way=0D unique, the failure *rates* are meaningless. One can pretty=0D much ignore his pronouncements - except as they apply to=0D specific components, rather than the whole system.=0D =0D Dale R.=0D =0D Dale Mahan wrote:=0D >=0D > Bob White wrote:=0D >=0D > >I've got facts that might save your life. You guys are taking a lot o= f=0D > >risks. I know what they are, but I'm too busy to tell you right now.=0D > >=0D > >Give me a break!=0D > >=0D > >Bob W.=0D > >=0D [Huge Snip]=0D >=0D > Yeah, I'm out to save lives too, but I don't have the time - nice=0D > thoughts. When do I attain "true enlightenment" from the single sourc= e=0D > of "vast eternal kozmik trooths" about the risks of rotary engines? I=0D > can hardly wait, but the "guru" doesn't have the time.=0D >=0D > Best,=0D >=0D > Dale=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=0D >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html=0D =0D =0D --=0D No virus found in this incoming message.=0D Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.=0D Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.0 - Release Date: 5/30/2005=0D =0D =2E --------------Boundary-00=_VCPGQL80000000000000 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Re: Al Wick
The information on his Website is sensible, what he posted on our si= te doesn't seem to be written by the same guy! Maybe he was having a bad = day, annalists usually give a reason for there findings.
Georges B.
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 06/02/05 06:= 14:49
Subject: [FlyRotar= y] Re: [Fwd: COZY: Rotary risks]
 
I think you folks are being to hard on Al Wick.  He appare= ntly
makes his living doing risk analysis; and like the workman
who has only one tool - say, a hammer - everything looks
like a nail.  The problem with his analysis is the same as=
with all statistical analysis: (1) how one selects the data
to be used, (2) grouping unlike samples together, and (3)
generalizing from too small a sample.
 
Since - at this point - every installation is in some way
unique, the failure *rates* are meaningless.  One can pret= ty
much ignore his pronouncements - except as they apply to
specific components, rather than the whole system.
 
Dale R.
 
Dale Mahan <dalemahan@ch= arter.net> wrote:
>
> Bob White wrote:
>
> >I've got facts that might save your life.  You gu= ys are taking a lot of
> >risks.  I know what they are, but I'm too busy to= tell you right now.
> >
> >Give me a break!
> >
> >Bob W.
> >
[Huge Snip]
>
> Yeah, I'm out to save lives too, but I don't have the time - ni= ce
> thoughts.  When do I attain "true enlightenment" = ; from the single source
> of "vast eternal kozmik trooths" about the risks of rotary engi= nes?  I
> can hardly wait, but the "guru" doesn't have the time.
>
> Best,
>
> Dale
 
 
 
 
>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 
 
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.0 - Release Date: 5/30/2005=
 
.
--------------Boundary-00=_VCPGQL80000000000000-- --=======AVGMAIL-429F1D631346======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.0 - Release Date: 5/30/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-429F1D631346=======--