|
I agree with Jerry on this one. To have an AD system in
place would extend liability on our "advisors" to the point that a liar (my
spelling of lawyer) would come after our group saying that we deemed a ship
airworthy.
I want to stay as an advisory person, not a
certification person.
I also want to look at projects with an open mind that
when someone does something different, before I would say it won't work, I would
like to check with the group to see if this new technique may be a better way of
doing something.
Ben
Sounds
stifling to me. At this point, the rotary installation is still evolving
rapidly and new ideas appear all the time. Trying to comply with "old" ADs is
a different mind set entirely. I think every builder should be encouraged to
follow Georges' recommendations, especially about ground testing but beyond
that is is up to the builder. I realize I am the only voice that is not
enthusiastic about the formation of the safety police. Jerry
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG
Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.14 - Release Date:
5/20/2005
|