X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 950909 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 May 2005 09:03:11 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm66aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050520130225.OPDQ2457.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm66aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 09:02:25 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm66aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050520130225.FTZN9421.ibm66aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 20 May 2005 09:02:25 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: More MAP measurement questions Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 08:02:42 -0500 Message-ID: <00e401c55d3c$35cdd530$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00E5_01C55D12.4CF7CD30" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00E5_01C55D12.4CF7CD30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here's another question - having little knowledge in the area, I'm considering Tracy's ECU and the EM2. What are your appreciations of the products. Is it the EM2 which provides the auto tune capability ? George (down under)=20 =20 Hi George, =20 Not much new to add to what's already been said, other than to agree = that it's a good combo. I also agree that you need to plan to expend some = effort to calibrate the EM-2, or it won't be quite right. Again, this has to = do with the fact that he made it able to work with just about any sensor = you could want to stick in there, and even be able to adjust for slight differences between individual sensors of the same type. =20 =20 From what Tracy has said, the auto tune feature will only work with = current EC-2's if you have an EM-2. In the future, he plans to have an updated version of the EC-2 that can accept an O2 sensor input, and do the auto = tune function without an EM-2. Even given the choice, it sounds like doing = it via the EM-2 is the best way to go, since you can watch what it's doing = in real time (so I've heard). I know Tracy was making some changes in the = auto tune feature before really releasing it, so I haven't seen a chip yet. Maybe it will get here in time for the next intake :-) =20 Cheers, Rusty (thanks for the address Jerry) ------=_NextPart_000_00E5_01C55D12.4CF7CD30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Here's another question - having little = knowledge=20 in the area, I'm considering Tracy's ECU and the EM2.
What are your appreciations of the=20 products.
Is it the EM2 which provides the = auto tune=20 capability ?
George (down under) 
 
Hi George,
 
Not much new to add to what's already been = said, other than=20 to agree that it's a good combo.  I also agree that you need to = plan to=20 expend some effort to calibrate the EM-2, or it won't be quite = right. =20 Again, this has to do with the fact that he made it able to work with = just about=20 any sensor you could want to stick in there, and even be able to adjust = for=20 slight differences between individual sensors of the same=20 type.   
 
From what Tracy has said, the auto = tune feature=20 will only work with current EC-2's if you have an EM-2.  In the = future, he=20 plans to have an updated version of the EC-2 that can accept an O2 = sensor input,=20 and do the auto tune function without an EM-2.  Even given the = choice, it=20 sounds like doing it via the EM-2 is the best way to go, since you=20 can watch what it's doing in real time (so I've heard).  I = know Tracy=20 was making some changes in the auto tune feature before really = releasing=20 it, so I haven't seen a chip yet.  Maybe it will get here in time = for the=20 next intake :-)
 
Cheers,
Rusty (thanks for the address=20 Jerry)
------=_NextPart_000_00E5_01C55D12.4CF7CD30--