X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 950294 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 19 May 2005 16:10:27 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.64; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm56aec.bellsouth.net ([67.32.133.236]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050519200941.VPPS7916.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm56aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 16:09:41 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.104] (really [67.32.133.236]) by ibm56aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050519200940.MPF11479.ibm56aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.2.104]> for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 16:09:40 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 16:09:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop balancing? From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3199363780_241492" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3199363780_241492 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 5/19/05 4:03 PM, "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote: > Greetings, > > I talked to ACES some more, and found that there are several other options for > less money. The 2015 unit is really the same as the 2020, but it's software > limited in a few ways. None of those are a factor for my purposes. The basic > 2015 analyzer is "only" about $1300, but once you add the essential items, it > can go up much higher. > > Once I explained to them what I needed to be able to do, they sent me a couple > more lower priced quotes. The bare minimum price is about $2800 for a 2015 > system with one accelerometer, and one optical sensor. I opted for the $3100 > option, which included a nice case, prop hub protractor, and mounts for the > sensors. It should be here tomorrow, assuming I can be home to sign for it. > Can't wait to balance my prop, engine, single rotor shafts, coffee mug, new > intake, etc. > > Cheers, > Rusty (yes, I'll be pimping myself out to the local experimentals) > Try balancing your priorities :) Buly --B_3199363780_241492 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Prop balancing? On 5/= 19/05 4:03 PM, "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote:=

Greetings,
I talked to ACES some = more, and found that there are several other options for less money.  T= he 2015 unit is really the same as the 2020, but it's software limited in a = few ways.  None of those are a factor for my purposes.  The basic = 2015 analyzer is "only" about $1300, but once you add the essentia= l items, it can go up much higher.  
Once I explained to th= em what I needed to be able to do, they sent me a couple more lower priced q= uotes.  The bare minimum price is about $2800 for a 2015 system with on= e accelerometer, and one optical sensor.  I opted for the $3100 option,= which included a nice case, prop hub protractor, and mounts for the sensors= .  It should be here tomorrow, assuming I can be home to sign for it. &= nbsp;Can't wait to balance my prop, engine, single rotor shafts, coffee mug,= new intake,  etc.  
Cheers,
Rusty (yes, I'll be pimping myself out to the local experimentals)


Try balancing your priorities :)
Buly

 --B_3199363780_241492--