X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.72] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 949504 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 19 May 2005 00:26:10 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.72; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm70aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050519042525.KEKM2732.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm70aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 00:25:25 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm70aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050519042525.ZFKP15910.ibm70aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 00:25:25 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: More MAP measurement questions Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:25:37 -0500 Message-ID: <002501c55c2a$cedd0420$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01C55C00.E606FC20" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C55C00.E606FC20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What's new about this theory? This is what I was telling you a week or = two ago. :-) I apologize for lack of clarity, causing you to have to re-invent this theory. =20 Al (Also running TWM TB)=20 =20 =20 That's now the old theory Al. The latest theory is that you and I are = just kidding ourselves, and the restriction is real. I just wish people like Bill and Bernie would have the decency to lie to me about their readings = :-) =20 You all know that I'm going to have to make a new intake to prove this (damit). =20 =20 Cheers, Rusty (guess what I just bought)=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C55C00.E606FC20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
What’s new about this=20 theory?  This is what I was telling you a week or two ago.=20 J

I apologize = for lack=20 of clarity, causing you to have to re-invent this = theory.

 

Al (Also = running TWM=20 TB) 

 

 

That's now the=20 old theory Al.  The latest theory is that you and I are just = kidding=20 ourselves, and the restriction is real.  I just wish people like = Bill and=20 Bernie would have the decency to lie to me about their readings=20 :-)  

 

You all know that=20 I'm going to have to make a new intake to prove this=20 (damit).  

 

Cheers,

Rusty (guess what=20 I just = bought) 

------=_NextPart_000_0026_01C55C00.E606FC20--