X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 945610 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 May 2005 09:08:25 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.73; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050516130738.SXCL2545.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 09:07:38 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050516130738.PDWY9550.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 09:07:38 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] TB was Re: EC2 Problem suggestion Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 08:07:42 -0500 Message-ID: <002d01c55a18$3ee028c0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002E_01C559EE.560A20C0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C559EE.560A20C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, thanks,Rusty, Can't keep all the configurations everyone has in my tired old brain {:>). By the way the TB in question I mentioned was = 75mm. =20 =20 Thanks Ed. I'm still trying to decide which way to go, but I have to = pick a size either way. Plenty of options, but the two leading choices at the moment are to duplicate what I already have, using larger tubes and = either a 48 or 50 dual TB from TWM. I could also do the shoebox intake trick, = and use a single 65-70 TB. Decisions, decisions. =20 =20 Do you know if the mustang TB has a MAP port? I know it has an air = motor attachment that has to be dealt with, but can that be used for MAP? =20 =20 Thanks, Rusty (pager, paging)=20 ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C559EE.560A20C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Ok, thanks,Rusty,  Can't = keep all the=20 configurations everyone has in my tired old brain {:>).  By the = way the=20 TB in question I mentioned was 75mm.
 
 
Thanks=20 Ed.  I'm still trying to decide which way to go, but I = have to=20 pick a size either way.  Plenty of options, but the two = leading=20 choices at the moment are to duplicate what I already have, using = larger=20 tubes and either a 48 or 50 dual TB from TWM.  I could also do = the=20 shoebox intake trick, and use a single 65-70 TB.  Decisions,=20 decisions. 
 
Do you know=20 if the mustang TB has a MAP port?  I know it has an air motor=20 attachment that has to be dealt with, but can that be used for=20 MAP?  
 
Thanks,
Rusty (pager,=20 paging) 
------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C559EE.560A20C0--