X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.theofficenet.com ([65.166.240.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with SMTP id 938599 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 May 2005 09:44:47 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.166.240.5; envelope-from=jackoford@theofficenet.com Received: (qmail 16084 invoked from network); 10 May 2005 13:27:27 -0000 Received: from dpc691941229.direcpc.com (HELO toshibauser) (69.19.41.229) by mail.theofficenet.com with SMTP; 10 May 2005 13:27:27 -0000 Message-ID: <000901c55566$53b82790$0700a8c0@toshibauser> From: "Jack Ford" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: center rotor OFF Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 06:43:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thanks, Alex, I'd still like to see some data on that. Where does the combustion efficiency cross the excess baggage curve? Particularly when (I believe) friction losses are proportional to v ^2. This is half in fun anyway. Thanks again, Jack Ford ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Madsen" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 8:32 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: center rotor OFF > The stuff about having to still move all the engine components is true. > However, you are missing the point that by shutting down one cylinder you > can run the engine at a higher rpm with less fuel where the engine (per > operating cylinder) is more efficient. > > Alex Madsen > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Jack Ford > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 9:50 PM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: center rotor OFF > > That entire variable cylinder configuration routine seems to me to be a > lot > of (old) advertising hype. The concept seems to be that the public thinks > fewer cylinders burn less fuel, so you can have your eight cylinder cake > and > > eat four cylinder fuel. Purest balderdash. > > The engine is still pulling eight cylinders worth of rings back and forth > in > > the bores even if it's not compressing any air. The cam is still trying to > lift sixteen (plus) valves and compress sixteen (plus) springs, ETC. You > can't reduce a lot of the pumping losses if the whole mechanism is still > rotating/reciprocating/wearing. > > Power is proportional to the amount of air/fuel mixture going through the > pump (assuming the same combustion efficiency). The reduced air/fuel > mixture > > (of the variable cylinder configuration at cruise) presumably produces > increased economy. BUT, it requires exactly the same amount of power to > push > > the vehicle down the road at cruise using 4,6,8,10 or 24+ cylinders. The > conventional method of accomplishing this enterprise is CLOSING THE > THROTTLE > > so less air/fuel mixture is pumped through. Has the exact same effect with > much less complicated design. > > So if you want more efficiency, just run at lower power settings. You will > accomplish the desired result. > > Retracting soapbox, > > Jack Ford > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ernest Christley" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 3:16 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: center rotor OFF > > >> Russell Duffy wrote: >> >>> OK, make me look it up :-) Apparently, they stop the valves from >>> opening, rather than leaving them open. I couldn't find anything that >>> gave details of exactly what point in the sequence they stop the valves, >>> so the cylinder could either be full of air (silly and wasteful of >>> power), empty of air (would cause vacuum that would be as bad as the >>> compression force), or perhaps somewhere in between. >> >> >> Other than friction losses, you'll get back everything you put into >> compressing the gas in the cylinder, Rusty. The process will be totally >> elastic. >> >> -- >> This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against >> instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make >> mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their >> decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." >> >> >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> >> > > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >