Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com
Message-ID: <001501c55514$27965e40$2402a8c0@edward2>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-938286@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Synthetic Oil and Leaded Gasoline.
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 23:55:49 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="Windows-1252";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charlie England" <ceengland@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:00 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Synthetic Oil and Leaded Gasoline.


> Ed Anderson wrote:
>
>> Here is something I came across which caught my attention since I 
>> normally use 100LL av gas and may interest some of the rest of you.
>> I am looking for other sources to see if there is a general consensus 
>> about use of 100% synthetic oil and 100LL or rather against it.
>> I am currently using Mobile 1 as my break in oil
>>  Ed
>
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> The article summarizes pretty well the stuff I've heard & read about pure 
> synthetics in piston a/c engines using 100LL. Were you using Mobil 1 
> before your incident? If so, did you see any evidence of the lead buildup 
> when you did your teardown?
>
> Charlie
> (sorry that I forgot to make the connection between your use of Mobil 1 & 
> avgas & mention it to you)


No, Charlie, actually I was using a different Exxon synthetic.  But, no, not 
any sign of lead build up.  Perhaps without valves to catch the lead and 
with less access of oil to the combustion area perhaps? the rotary is less 
susceptible to the problem.  However, having found that Mobile is being sued 
due to damaged aircraft engines from folks who used their aviation 
synthetic, I may have to reconsider.

Ed