X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <daval@iprimus.com.au>
Received: from smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au ([210.50.76.196] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5)
  with ESMTP id 938299 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 May 2005 23:28:01 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=210.50.76.196; envelope-from=daval@iprimus.com.au
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (211.26.28.186) by smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.036)
        id 426404FF0087461F for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 May 2005 13:27:14 +1000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
In-Reply-To: <list-937517@logan.com>
References: <list-937517@logan.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--50522519
Message-Id: <3be6b3deda1a33a3132837c6b279dd48@iprimus.com.au>
From: david mccandless <daval@iprimus.com.au>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Synthetic Oil and Leaded Gasoline.
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:27:10 +0800
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622)


--Apple-Mail-2--50522519
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed

Hi Ed, any chance you could ratchet up the font size on your email=20
program? I have to take my glasses on and off repeatedly with thread=20
responses; I can get most of them bare-eyed, but yours is just too=20
small. With thanks, Dave McC
On 10/05/2005, at 2:21 AM, Ed Anderson wrote:

> Here is something I came across which caught my attention since I=20
> normally use 100LL av gas and may interest some of the rest of you.
> I am looking for other sources to see if there is a general consensus=20=

> about use of 100% synthetic oil and 100LL or rather against it.
> I am currently using Mobile 1 as my break in oil
> =A0=

--Apple-Mail-2--50522519
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Ed, any chance you could ratchet up the font size on your email
program? I have to take my glasses on and off repeatedly with thread
responses; I can get most of them bare-eyed, but yours is just too
small. With thanks, Dave McC=20

On 10/05/2005, at 2:21 AM, Ed Anderson wrote:


<excerpt><fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>Here is something I
came across which caught my attention since I normally use 100LL av
gas and may interest some of the rest of you.</smaller></fontfamily>

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>I am looking for other
sources to see if there is a general consensus about use of 100%
synthetic oil and 100LL or rather against it.</smaller></fontfamily>

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><smaller>I am currently using Mobile 1
as my break in oil</smaller></fontfamily>

=A0</excerpt>=

--Apple-Mail-2--50522519--