X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 937483 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 May 2005 13:58:17 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2005 14:11:55 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.92,169,1112587200"; d="scan'208"; a="48438307:sNHT12515569176" Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j49HvDe8012656 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 13:57:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 9 May 2005 13:57:22 -0400 Received: from [64.102.45.251] ([64.102.45.251]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 9 May 2005 13:57:22 -0400 Message-ID: <427FA482.8000009@nc.rr.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 13:57:22 -0400 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 redundancy References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2005 17:57:22.0113 (UTC) FILETIME=[8CB62B10:01C554C0] Wendell Voto wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "WALTER B KERR" >To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" >Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 8:23 AM >Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 redundancy > > > > >>Jim S wrote:If we've mostly agreed that we're sizing fuse/CB to protect >>the wire and >>not the component, what would be the point of redundant feeds to a >>common power line inside the box? >>What failure mode are we protecting against with this scheme? ... Jim S. >> ----------------------------------------------------- >> >>We are protecting against a defective fuse such as Paul had or a direct >>short in one of the lines that has blown a good fuse. The other line will >>continue to operate the EC2 if you have diodes to prevent a backfeed. Of >>course you wish to separate the wires to prevent the burning one from >>destroying the 2nd one. >> >>Bernie >> >> >> >If one line is shorted and they are tied together in the box, then both >lines - fuses or breakers - will see the short fault and trip. > >Wendell > > > > Or worse. Both fuses/breakers see the fault and together they're strong enough to overcome it. A single 10A fuse blows after little spark in the open end of the cracked wire insulation. No problem. But what happens when you provide the 'arc welder' some backup. -- ,|"|"|, | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |