Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #21646
From: Wendell Voto <jwvoto@itlnet.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 redundancy
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 12:26:09 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

----- Original Message -----
From: "WALTER B KERR" <jbker@juno.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 8:23 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 redundancy


Jim S wrote:If we've mostly agreed that we're sizing fuse/CB to protect
the wire and
not the component, what would be the point of redundant feeds to a
common power line inside the box?
What failure mode are we protecting against with this scheme? ... Jim S.
 -----------------------------------------------------

We are protecting against a defective fuse such as Paul had or a direct
short in one of the lines that has blown a good fuse. The other line will
continue to operate the EC2 if you have diodes to prevent a backfeed. Of
course you wish to separate the wires to prevent the burning one from
destroying the 2nd one.

Bernie

If one line is shorted and they are tied together in the box, then both
lines - fuses or breakers - will see the short fault and trip.

Wendell

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster