X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 937275 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 May 2005 11:25:30 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.73; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm71aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050509152443.RWBP2545.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm71aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 11:24:43 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm71aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050509152443.ZDQD1909.ibm71aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 11:24:43 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EC2 redundancy Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 10:24:51 -0500 Message-ID: <002101c554ab$3e6b3000$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55481.55952800" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55481.55952800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At some point I asked Tracy if redundant power leads were truly = redundant. As I recall, he stated that the two power leads are connected (to each other) inside the box. =20 I would like to hear Tracy's thoughts on this again when he gets back. = It would seem so easy for him to make these truly separate, but even when = he redesigned the EC-2 board, he didn't do it. To me, that means he feels = like he has a very good reason not to. I'm as guilty as anyone when it comes = to wanting to "improve" things, but maybe it will make better sense if he explains his reasons. =20 =20 Cheers, Rusty =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55481.55952800 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

At some point I asked Tracy if redundant power leads = were truly=20 redundant.  As I recall, he stated that the two power leads are = connected=20 (to each other) inside the box.

 
I would = like to hear=20 Tracy's thoughts on this again when he gets back.  It would seem so = easy=20 for him to make these truly separate, but even when he redesigned the = EC-2=20 board, he didn't do it.  To me, that means he feels like he has a = very good=20 reason not to.  I'm as guilty as anyone when it comes to wanting to = "improve" things, but maybe it will make better sense if he explains his = reasons.   
 
Cheers,
Rusty
 




 ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01C55481.55952800--