X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mxsf38.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 937175 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 May 2005 09:37:30 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.28.165; envelope-from=cardmarc@charter.net Received: from mxip09.cluster1.charter.net (mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.139]) by mxsf38.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j49Dai7g026266 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 09:36:44 -0400 Received: from fep02.charter.net (HELO 209.225.8.224) (209.225.8.82) by mxip09.cluster1.charter.net with SMTP; 09 May 2005 09:36:44 -0400 Message-Id: <41djhc$qp7qdc@mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net> X-Ironport-AV: i="3.92,168,1112587200"; d="scan'208"; a="898886060:sNHT25440700" X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.18 (webedge20-101-1108-20050216) From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: To Lynn Hanover re: windage trays Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 9:36:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I believe all the FD pans (1993+) have the anti-slosh/foaming shield built in as stock. Marc > From: Lehanover@aol.com > Date: 2005/05/06 Fri PM 10:07:24 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: To Lynn Hanover re: windage trays > > > In a message dated 05/06/2005 06:44 Central Daylight Time, > jerryhey@earthlink.net writes: > > Lynn, I would appreciate your advice. I am starting out to build > wedge oil pans and wonder about the advisability of having a windage > tray at all since they are not used stock 13-B or Renesis. The > Renesis oil pan has a sub floor about .75 inches above the actual real > bottom where oil can be trapped and presumably de-frothed. This > might only be necessary because the pan is so shallow. I don't know > and am looking forward to hearing your comments. The wedge oil pans > would be much deeper toward rear and that is where I hope to place the > pick up. Thanks, Jerry > > > > > > The primary reason for the windage tray in rotary racing with the internal > pump, is to keep the entire oil supply from filling up the front cover and > uncovering the pickup under hard braking. > > I have thought about the problem of keeping the pickup covered during climb > and descent. > How much of a climb angle would be tolerated before a problem develops. > Riding down to Sun&Fun in the Bonanza I decided the angles involved were just too > shallow to be a factor. > > That only leaves the defoaming as a benefit. We were racing without a tray > for years before adding one. During a race (40 minutes) the oil pressure would > drop from 85-90 PSI to 70 PSI. > > Some of that from oil temps going up, and some from oil foaming. We were > putting it up into the front cover under braking and foaming the crap out of it > with the front counter weight. This is with a stock pan with a quart of oil > extra added. > > A conical shaped pan with the pickup at the inverted apex would seem close > to the ideal if you maintain the internal pump. If you want the tray for > defoaming I would suggest a flat plate with a 5/8" gap around the edges the full > size of the pan. Or try the deep pan without any tray at all. If you don't use > steep climb angles the oil will stay off of the front counter weight and > little foaming will occur. Most foaming in the straight line is cooling oil from > the rotors, and that exits at an angle before it gets to the pan and is just > below the breather port. > > Lynn E. Hanover > > >