Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.162.206; envelope-from=wdleonard@gmail.com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Q7HQmsW7hOLtzAaz8s7l4F7QEKFcBTvgwxQRz9IG/PQ09ElsayA5mV1hnnvbigMjgx98jF4IEI6Bi5DxzXBfWCtDvBFVxlsepzHwdiPBKb3WgisqUrEcq1XD8p1Cuna70Zn2pCxF2MA0r4EjrDj/a3L+J3NJvSkJwZ3DZ9VyMUs=
Message-ID: <1c23473f05042418204cd142eb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:20:39 -0700
From: David Leonard <wdleonard@gmail.com>
Reply-To: David Leonard <wdleonard@gmail.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] hi flow turbo
In-Reply-To: <list-912881@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <list-912881@logan.com>

Well, they do the same things as Max, but it is hard to tell who does
those things more and best.

How many hours now on the new turbo?  What MAP are you running most of the =
time?

Dave Leonard

On 4/24/05, John Slade <sladerj@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > When I talked with max he didn't seem too interested in making another
> > turbo like John's for me.
> Yea. Max comes across like that sometimes. Maybe the genius showing throu=
gh
> :)
>=20
> > These guys also wanted a core, and they
> > took 3 months, but did a very nice job so far as I can tell.
> What did they do, exactly? How does it compare with what Max does?
> See http://www.turbonetics.com.au/
>=20
> By the way, my summary of the new turbo so far:
>=20
> 1. Less oomph at take-off (but enough)
> 2. All the boost I can use, and then some
> 3. It's holding together so far.
>=20
> John
>=20
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>=20


--=20
Wm. David Leonard