X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5)
  with ESMTP id 912883 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:55:27 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=sladerj@bellsouth.net
Received: from JSLADE ([65.8.215.110]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP
          id <20050424125438.BJJF2467.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@JSLADE>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:54:38 -0400
From: "John Slade" <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: hi flow turbo
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:54:36 -0400
Message-ID: <NMELKLCBIAJLEHHCHLJBKEELEGAA.sladerj@bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <list-912812@logan.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409

> When I talked with max he didn't seem too interested in making another
> turbo like John's for me.
Yea. Max comes across like that sometimes. Maybe the genius showing through
:)

> These guys also wanted a core, and they
> took 3 months, but did a very nice job so far as I can tell.
What did they do, exactly? How does it compare with what Max does?
See http://www.turbonetics.com.au/

By the way, my summary of the new turbo so far:

1. Less oomph at take-off (but enough)
2. All the boost I can use, and then some
3. It's holding together so far.

John