X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au ([210.50.30.196] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 912654 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:04:30 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=210.50.30.196; envelope-from=daval@iprimus.com.au Received: from [192.168.1.8] (211.26.28.186) by smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.036) id 4263F6DC001A56B3 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 10:03:42 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1cff1b44dbc1e5272ca11c5a2335165e@iprimus.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: david mccandless Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: WARNING V Grooves Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:03:37 +0800 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) On 24/04/2005, at 7:43 AM, Ernest Christley wrote: > david mccandless wrote: > >> Hi to all, has anyone ever considered ball-milling out the apex seal >> grooves and pressing in a round tough steel insert and then milling >> the seal slot in the steel insert. This would then be' horse shoe' >> cross section, so to speak. The corner button seals could also fit >> into the ends. Maybe a new rotor would be cheaper, but this may have >> better reliability and longer life. FWIW, Dave Mc >> On 24/04/2005, at 5:24 AM, Ed Anderson wrote: >> > > Sounds expensive. And how will you keep the insert from flying out of > the rotor as centripetal force tries to fling it out at 2000RPM? > ****Hi Ernest, I think you mean centrifugal force; and if the slot was > ball-milled, the insert would be captured by both "claws" of the > milled channel; also, just like the seals, the rotor housing would > contain the whole assembly. Anyway, I think your comments about > 400hrs/ 5 years makes much more sense in the overall scheme of things. > BR,Dave McC