Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #20659
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: All Parts have arrived, Whew!
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 09:01:24 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
It appears I've missed something along the way here.  We've got all these rotors being pitched because the apex seal slots are wallowed out a little.  The replacement price seems pretty high (and likely to inflate quickly when more folks start inspecting the slots of replacement rotors) and one has to wonder how long the "used rotor" supply will last.  What I seem to have missed is the compelling reason why we can't simply mill the slots out to 3 mm, install new seals and continue the march.  I know Tracy's "new formulation" seals only come in 2 mm, but I speculate that would be pretty easy to change given the current rash of wallowed out 2 mm slots and the potential market for 3mm versions.  I've got this idea that 3 mm seals has been sort of "elective surgery" and perhaps priced accordingly.  Given the potential demand, it seems this could change significantly.

From an engineering standpoint, what's the problem? ... Jim S.


George Lendich wrote:

Ed,
It could be their rotors don't exceed the tolerances - by design or just luck!
Also we are running continuous high power, unlike cars, so advice on what's acceptable in cars, do not necessarily relate to Aviation.
 
I picked-up a number of damaged rotors from the local Rotary shop and all the damaged rotors which quite obviously suffered broken apex seals, which destroyed the rotors and quite obviously the rotor housings - had out of spec slots.  There were some that seemed good 9.7:1 rotors until the apex seals broke - they do a nasty job on the inside of the motor!!
 
If your anything like me Ed - when there's a lemon I'm gunna get it!!
I just live with that knowledge, and check everything now.
It's any easy thing to check!
 
George (down under)

    Well, George, I would not  take the conclusion that far.  We have
    folks flying with several hundred more hours than I have with no
    apex seal failures.  In fact to the best of my knowledge, I am the
    only one I am aware of other than Chuck Dunlap who's rotary engine
    swallowed a 1/4" dia steel bolt (it was retained - so we know) to
    have an apex seal failure in an aircraft.  However, I do believe
    that folks need to be more aware of the true condition of their
    used engine components - I know all probably did was look at it
    and not seeing any obviously defects or dings said - "good to go!"
         As you know, Leon is convinced my apex seal failure was also due
    to foreign object ingestion - I certainly can not prove it was
    something else (like the apex seal slop)  although I don't
    believe a foreign object  to be the case - belief is not a fact {:>).               Ed


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster