X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from corpprd-pxy2.canfor.ca ([198.162.160.3] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 911279 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:36:41 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=198.162.160.3; envelope-from=Steve.Bartrim@canfor.com Received: from canformail1.canfor.ca (canformail1.canfor.ca [199.60.193.29]) by corpprd-pxy2.canfor.ca (Build 103 8.9.3p2/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA03281 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2005 08:35:54 -0700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C54750.F8AE8FD8" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Aeroturbine muffler Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 08:35:54 -0700 Message-ID: <091A2D42FAF91A41B84750D269FC97E72B3151@canformail1.canfor.ca> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Aeroturbine muffler Thread-Index: AcVGtKGic2XVNCF6SLqSZqJG0rkLIQAmvPeA From: "Bartrim, Todd" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C54750.F8AE8FD8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark; While I'm currently satisfied with the performance of my homemade "SpinTech" muffler, I'm very intrigued by this one. I could find no weights listed, but it looks like it shouldn't be more than ~7#. What I find most appealing about this muffler is the claimed "cooler" performance. It seems that they're implying an overall reduction in temps, due to less backpressure as well as a cooling effect within the muffler. As some of you may recall, I incorporated a muffler housing into the bottom of my fuselage to keep the muffler out of the airstream and out of the cowl, however while it doesn't get too hot, a reduction of this temp would be welcome. You should contact them for further details as I and I'm certain many others would be very interested. =20 Todd ________________________________ It looks to be very streamlined, made of SS, lightweight, and has no packing. It sells for less than $200 (except for the 5" model). This looks like this just might be what I've been looking for. More info available at http://www.pickupspecialties.com/Aero_Turbine/aeroturbine_mufflers.htm. Comments??? =20 Mark S. (I have no affiliation with this company) ------_=_NextPart_001_01C54750.F8AE8FD8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mark;

While I'm currently satisfied with = the=20 performance of my homemade "SpinTech" muffler, I'm very intrigued by = this one. I=20 could find no weights listed, but it looks like it shouldn't be more = than ~7#.=20 What I find most appealing about this muffler is the claimed "cooler"=20 performance. It seems that they're implying an overall reduction in = temps, due=20 to less backpressure as well as a cooling effect within the muffler. As = some of=20 you may recall, I incorporated a muffler housing into the bottom of my = fuselage=20 to keep the muffler out of the airstream and out of the cowl, however = while it=20 doesn't get too hot, a reduction of this temp would be=20 welcome.

You should contact them for = further details as I=20 and I'm certain many others would be very = interested.

Todd

It looks to be very = streamlined,=20 made of SS, lightweight, and has no packing. It sells for less than = $200=20 (except for the 5” model). This looks like this just might = be what I’ve=20 been looking for. More info available at http://www.pickupspecialties.com/Aero_Turbine/aeroturbine_mufflers= .htm.=20 Comments???

Mark=20 S.

(I have no affiliation = with this=20 company)

------_=_NextPart_001_01C54750.F8AE8FD8--