X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.186] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTPS id 900278 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:00:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.186; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-31-69-134.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.69.134]) by mail05.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j3KM08MJ010699 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:00:10 +1000 Message-ID: <007301c545f4$db64a4b0$86451fd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Single Rotor Balance Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:03:59 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Hi Fred, I wish I knew what your saying! I nearly got the single beat, but realistically speaking a dynamic balance is the only way to go. I would suggest for chaps who are serious about smoothness and therefore balance, getting the two rotor balanced is a must if their mixing parts. It does add some extra cost but in the overall scheme of things it solves the problem - provided you can find someone who knows what their doing. George ( down under) > In a message dated 04/15/05 21:39 EDT Lehanover@aol.com writes: > > "In the single rotor, the whole rig is going to be dynamically balanced, > so the > two counter weights will equal the weight of the rotor exactly." > > Please forgive my delay in commenting on the above. It took several days > for > me to work up the courage to dispute anything posted by Lynn Hanover whose > experience and knowledge place him at the very top level of the Rotary Gods. > How's that for kissing up (;-)? > > In a single rotor the counter weights must statically balance out the > unbalance > of the eccentric shaft PLUS the rotor, its attachments, and cooling oil. IN > ADDITION, they must do so without creating a longitudinal or rocking > couple that > will generate a dynamic unbalance. In other words, the CG plane of the > counter > weight combination must fall exactly on the CG plane of the unbalance > they are > correcting. If not, the spinning assembly will try to wobble. > > I realize this is a bit of a quibble but with the increasing interest in > single rotor > engines there should be adequate recognition that balancing one is not easy. > Balance Diagram courtesy of PL's ACRE NL. > > With all due reverence, Lynn. > > Fred O. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >