Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #20520
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Area calcuation for Cone air filters was [FlyRotary] Re: Air filters
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:59:06 -0500
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Rusty, some of the cones have an opening on the intake in and another smaller cone that is inside the large cone for increased filtering area.  They don't specify the dimensions of this inner cone so I conservatively just make it 10% of the total filter area of the larger cone. 
 
That makes sense Ed.  I later saw what they called an inverted top that had that sort of arrangement.  With the size I could use, I don't think there could be much of an inside cone.     
 
That filter should give you approx 352 square inches of  filter space.  For a 13B at 7000 rpm K&N area calculation says 53 sq inches is sufficient, so yes, I think I can safely say you have more than enough filter area.  So thats good as it will give more filtering and less airflow obstruction. 
 
I have to admit that I'm still having trouble with your spreadsheet.  When you calculate 53 sq inches using their formula, this seems to indicate that you need 53 sq in of "filter element" surface area.   It looks like they're assuming all their filter elements to be the same thickness by eliminating that parameter.  From that standpoint, I think you can drop the X4 factor to estimate the pleat area, because they've already built that into their recommended area formula.  
 
If all we care about is the filter element surface area, then your "filter area" (i15) seems to give the number we need to compare to their formula.  This would be assuming that you have one of their more normal filters that doesn't have the end open. 
 
Back to the filter I had mentioned, 4.5 base x 3.5 top x 5.75 length.  In their sizing info, it appears that they want you to reduce the height by .75", because the ends of the filter are sealed in rubber, and don't pass any air.  That makes my example 5" tall.  using those numbers, I get 63 sq in for filter area.  Since I will run 7500, that makes the requirement 57 sq in, rather than 53.   Sounds like it will still work up to about 8200 rpm, which should be sufficient :-)  
 
Heck, I'll order one and see how it works.  Easy to test on the ground before going to the trouble of making a box for it to live in.     
 
Rusty (almost deleted this since it was getting out of control) 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster