Return-Path: Received: from imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 883632 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:10:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.69; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from [192.168.2.102] ([67.32.133.236]) by imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050419180937.YRXB2063.imf21aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[192.168.2.102]> for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:09:37 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:09:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel return to tank From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3196764577_1192185" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3196764577_1192185 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit > > Normally submerged near bottom of tank? Near top of tank? > > I believe the standard is to put the return near the top, but I'd bet it > doesn't make any difference really. > > Cheers, > Rusty > > > Rusty, I believe returning to the bottom will create slight back pressure on > the pump and the possibilities of fuel siphoning out if there is a leak in the > system? > Buly > --B_3196764577_1192185 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel return to tank

 Normally submerged near bottom of tank? Near top of tank?

I believe the standard is to put the return near t= he top, but I'd bet it doesn't make any difference really.  
Cheers,
Rusty


Rusty, I believe returning to the bottom will create = slight back pressure on the pump and the possibilities of fuel siphoning out= if there is a leak in the system?
Buly


--B_3196764577_1192185--