Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 883547 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:57:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.73; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm71aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.11 201-253-122-130-111-20040605) with ESMTP id <20050419165648.ZMXM22125.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm71aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:56:48 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm71aec.bellsouth.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.01 201-2136-104-101-20040929) with ESMTP id <20050419165646.NAZS1909.ibm71aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:56:46 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: stock 3rd gen oil filter- bypass valve? Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:57:08 -0500 Message-ID: <057201c54500$d2a32170$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0573_01C544D6.E9CD1970" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0573_01C544D6.E9CD1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not positive, but I was under the impression that all of the = filters had bypass valves of some sort to prevent damage. =20 =20 I was thinking that too. In fact, I think it's harder to get a filter without the bypass. I made a note to take a look at one of the = filters, and it may be pretty obvious whether it has a bypass. =20 =20 By the way, your remote mount oil filter.. are you using a racing beat remote mount, or something from summit racing? or did you fabricate a = remote mount out of the stock filter "pedestal" ?=20 =20 My remote mount is using the stock filter "pedestal", and a stock 3rd = gen filter (because they're short, made for high pressure, and I still have = a bag of them). =20 =20 I'm still debating this whole air filter thing too (the reason for considering this oil filter plumbing change). I think I've identified a = way to install a reasonably sized cone shaped air filter, but just haven't decided if it's worth it. What I really need to do if prove whether I'm really only getting 27" MAP at WOT. =20 =20 Cheers, Rusty=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0573_01C544D6.E9CD1970 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
I am not positive, but I was under the impression that all of the = filters=20 had bypass valves of some sort to prevent damage.  
 
I was=20 thinking that too.  In fact, I think it's harder to get a filter = without=20 the bypass.   I made a note to take a look at one of the = filters,=20 and it may be pretty obvious whether it has a bypass. =20  
 
By the way, your remote mount oil = filter.. are=20 you using a racing beat remote mount, or something from summit racing? = or did=20 you fabricate a remote mount out of the stock filter "pedestal"=20 ? 
 
My remote=20 mount is using the stock filter "pedestal", and a stock 3rd gen = filter=20 (because they're short, made for high pressure, and I still have a bag = of=20 them).   
 
I'm still=20 debating this whole air filter thing too (the reason for = considering this=20 oil filter plumbing change).  I think I've identified a way to = install a=20 reasonably sized cone shaped air filter, but just haven't decided if = it's worth=20 it.  What I really need to do if prove whether I'm really only = getting 27"=20 MAP at WOT. 
 
Cheers,
Rusty=20
------=_NextPart_000_0573_01C544D6.E9CD1970--