Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 882813 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:47:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net Received: from [65.176.161.64] (helo=earthlink.net) by smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DNfx7-0005JK-U4 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:46:54 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer; b=STSoj4RTqPrux3hrldH1CEvD751tbiKQZ1YKNe8fLHinNlgQD6RYISydWNqMr+z1; Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:48:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Apex Seal Groove Wear and Air Filters was Re: [FlyRotary]... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) From: Jerry Hey To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <5CA46D2A-B064-11D9-B071-0003931B0C7A@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79d6c8fbbabc86156873c9eb91fe533d13350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 65.176.161.64 On Monday, April 18, 2005, at 05:24 PM, George Lendich wrote: > >> Hi Ernest, one assumption you make that I will throttle back for >> cruise, is probably not true. At least I have seldom done so with my >> Continental powered Tailwind. I plan to take off full throttle and >> cruise right around 6000 rpm which is the sweet spot (lowest bearing >> load) for the 13B. But your point about the complexity of the >> switchable intake is well taken. I prefer the idea of filtered ram >> air and am going to see I can fit it under the cowl. It is amazing >> that >> we have been able to talk ourselves into supplying unfiltered air at >> all. Lot of rationalizing on that one. I am as guilty as anyone else. >> BTW, a few months ago I proposed the filtering ram air on the >> other >> list and was told that filters and ram air did not go together. I >> gave >> it up at that time but here we are again. Jerry > > Jerry, > Am I wrong in thinking that a ram intake will force air through a > filter? > George ( down under) I am betting on it George. Seems logical, but pressure loss across the filter was the concern. PL said the pressure loss would negate the ram air effect. I think that is a little strong. I imagine there will be some performance degradation but not too much. On the positive side there is Bill Jepson's report that filtered ram air is being utilized on motorcycles with good results. As someone else has noted, protecting the engine is worth a few hp. Jerry > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >