Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.167; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net
Message-ID: <425A025B.5030707@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:51:39 -0500
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: SQ2000 flying again
References: <list-864522@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-864522@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Paul,
Have you looked at the Velocity under-wing intakes?  Sounds like just 
what you want ... Jim S.

sqpilot@bellsouth.net wrote:

> Hi, Rusty....I just checked out Tracy's website and his discussion 
> regarding the scat hose.It looks like he had a pretty long hose 
> running from the intake manifold, behind the engine, then back towards 
> the nose of the aircraft, My application will be a short hose 
> (approximately 10 inches) traveling away from the engine into the wing 
> root and NACA duct.  I'm going to give it a try. I can always replace 
> it with a fiberglass tube if necessary.  Thanks for the input.  Paul 
> Conner
>  
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Russell Duffy <mailto:13brv3@bellsouth.net>
>     *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft <mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
>     *Sent:* Sunday, April 10, 2005 10:40 PM
>     *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: SQ2000 flying again
>
>     Hi, Tracy....thanks for the heads up....any more info would be
>     appreciated....was it a long scat tube, and was it 3 inch
>     diameter?  I assume you could not ingest enough air?  Thanks for
>     any more info you can provide.  Paul Conner 
>      
>     I recall Tracy saying that there was an almost unbelievable
>     increase in air temp when using the scat/sceet/whatever hose.  I'm
>     still using such a hose, and eventually will get around to putting
>     temp sensors in each end.  It might be just as easy to make a new
>     fiberglass (ack, gasp, cough) tube instead.  I think breaking in
>     the engine will gain more power than that for me now though.  
>      
>     Cheers,
>     Rusty
>      
>