X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop-Diagnostic: (direct reply)\eX-PolluStop-Score: 0.00\eX-PolluStop: Scanned with Niversoft PolluStop 2.1 RC1, http://www.niversoft.com/pollustop Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 864322 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:41:14 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-185-127.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.185.127]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j3ANeSY5012661 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <002201c53e26$ad4189c0$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Spark Plug type Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:40:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine You are correct, Dale. The "E" refers to 19mm thread_Length. However, I did hold the two type plugs up for a comparison and they appeared the same overall length (Penetration wise) - clearly I was wrong. I intend to measure both with calipers tomorrow and will let the list know. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Rogers" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 3:17 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Spark Plug type > Ed, > > It may be my memory is foggy (from working too many hours > in a week) but, IRRC, "reach" refers to the _thread_ length, > not the total penetration including the electrode. It would > be good to lay the new plugs along side the standard ones, > with a straight edge on the gasket service, and compare > them. > > Dale R. > COZY MkIV-R13B #1254 > . (__ > . |----==(__)==----| > . o/ \o > > ---- Ed Anderson wrote: > > > I went back and check the e mail and sure enough I misread the type plug as B9EQV vice B9EGV. Interesting in I had actually showed the e mail to the auto parts guy with the correct type circled - but verbally spoke the B9EQV, neither one of us caught the "minor" difference - sigh! Both plugs have the 19mm (3/5") reach - but don't know if the ground electrode is different or not. The B9EQV looks just like a conventional plug with perhaps a bit finer center electrode and with a ground strap off the side. Any difference there could have made a difference - assuming the plugs are the problem. > > > > Well, in a few minutes I am off to see what I can find out and to start taken the engine off. > > > > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >