|
|
Also, IIRC PL also writes on nearly every Rhino drawing "Copyright Paul
Lamar", albeit in Greek, but it is there nevertheless.
This should clear up:
a) who draw the work
b) who claims the copyright
c) who claims the credit
...right on the subjects of the whgole trouble - PL's own drawings.
Thomas J.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Ruttan" <ericruttan@chartermi.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 10:43 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Copyright
Dear Sanderson et al;
If the list has moved on, I appologize for wasting your time.
Paul claimed it was not legal. I suggest responces were based on that
claim. He did not claim it was not right. It is both fair and right to
educate the world about the brilliance of Paul's drawings and ideas.
Experimental Aviation that we do is only allowed for the purpose of
education. Copyright and patent SPECIFICALY allow duplication and sharing
for educational use.
No one can own or control an idea. One can make money with an idea (for a
limited time), but cannot not control its use or propagation.
Eric
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sanderson" <mldsub@earthlink.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 7:01 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Copyright
Hello All,
A lot of this discussion seems centered on WHAT IS LEGAL vs. WHAT IS
RIGHT.
IMHO, Paul made the drawing so they do not get posted without Paul's OK.
I don't ever think it is acceptable to do something wrong just because it
is
legal.
--Sandy
-- No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.4 - Release Date: 3/27/2005
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|