Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.198.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 816366 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:37:46 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.198.39; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net Received: from quail (bgp01386375bgs.brodwy01.nm.comcast.net[68.35.160.229]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2005032223365401500el16je>; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:36:59 +0000 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:36:53 -0700 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel injector size, and redrive losses Message-Id: <20050322163653.7832fd9f.rlwhite@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.6 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jerry, Try here: http://www.buyfordracing.com/shop/product_info.php?products_id=3D360 $259 for a set of 8. If you only want 4, I might be interested in the oth= er 4. Write me off list.=20 I used to have this on the Wiki, but everything since March 8 has magically dissapeared. Bob W. (More frequent backups on the agenda.) On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:29:39 -0500 Jerry Hey wrote: > Thanks Ken, since I am building the fuel rail and injecting into the=20 > bell mouths the Ford's can be easily installed. Glad to hear the=20 > electrical hook up is the same. If I just say "Ford 42 lb injectors,"=20 > are they properly identified? I'm tired of planning. This week end=20 > I will start to actually build the intake. Jerry >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, at 06:06 PM, kenpowell@comcast.net wrote: >=20 > > Jerry, the Ford injectors are not directly compatible.=A0 Here are the= =20 > > details:=A0 > > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 ENGINE SIDE=A0=A0=A0=A0 FUEL RAIL SIDE > > Ford=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0.55"=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0.55=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 > > Mazda=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0.65 (with the FAT Mazda rubber ring) > > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0.435 > > Note that the electrical connector is the same (center spline=20 > > top/inside and center lower outside).=A0 So, the Ford injector will hoo= k=20 > > up electrically but the fuel connectors must be different. > > Ken Powell > > Bryant, Arkansas > > 501-847-4721 > > =A0 > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > > > > Ken, are the Ford injectors interchangeable with the stock Mazda > > > injectors as far as size, plug and so on? If so, do you have a part > > > number? BTW sorry but there is no way you can run a p port at 7500 > > > rpm and only get 225 hp. Can you accept 240? Jerry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, at 03:48 PM, kenpowell@comcast.net wrote: > > > > > > > > > But this graph was for a carburated engine so it really > > > proves nothing. Besides, the engine only needs to be as rich as we > > > want to run - you can't hurt the engine by running lean (I know, if > > > you run it into the trees on a 100 F. day that will HURT it!!!). I > > > have not seen any graphs showing power improvement beyond 0.6 on a NA > > > engine and with very little to be gained by going beyond .55. If > > > anyone can educate me differently please do so (no kidding, I'm=20 > > trying > > > to learn). I'm planning on using 42 lb Ford injectors for my P-Port > > > motor, if this isn't enough I want to know (planning on 225 HP at=20 > > 7500 > > > RPM). > > > > > > Ken Powell > > > > > > Bryant, Arkansas > > > > > > 501-847-4721 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > > > > > > > > v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} > > > w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape > > > {behavior:url(#default#VML);} st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } > > > > > > Arial0000,0000,8080Rus > > > ty, > > > > > > > > > Arial0000,0000,8080Are > > > you sure you=CCre allowing yourself enough margin on the top end by > > > using .55 bsfc. This chart (snitched from the other list) indicates > > > that .55 is about right up to around 7500, but at 8000 rpm bsfc will > > > be up around .60. What does that do to your hp numbers? > > > > > > > > > > > > Arial0000,0000,8080 > > > smaller> > > > > > > > > > Arial0000,0000,8080Mar > > > k > > > S. > > > > > > > > > Arial0000,0000,8080 > > > smaller> > > > > > > > > >< > > > > > > > > > > > > Arial0000,0000,8080 > > > smaller> > > > > > > > > >< > > > > > > > > Times New Roman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From:Rotary motors in > > > aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf > > > OfRussell Duffy > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:25 PM > > > > > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > > > > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel injector size, and redrive > > > losses > > > > > > > > > Times New Roman > > > > > > > > > Times New RomanRC Engineering's calcs show > > > that you are good to 302 HP at 43 psi fuel pressure, .50 BSFC, and > > > 100% duty cycle. Of course you can't run the injectors at 100% > > > (except maybe briefly like a drag race, not applicable to aircraft). > > > So at 80% duty cycle the 38 lb injectors should be good for 242 HP. > > > Enjoy your idle!!! Your injectors are big enough unless you P-Port > > > and turn at least 8000 RPM. > > > > > > > > > > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000Hi > > > Ken, > > > > > > > > > Times New Roman > > > > > > > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000RC > > > Engineering's calc shows the same as the fuel calculator that I > > > posted the other day. Four 38 lb/hr injectors, at 80% duty cycle, .55 > > > BSFC, should be good for about 220 HP at the flywheel. I imagine that > > > will be enough for the current engine, but not by a wide margin. I > > > plan to run this engine as high as 8000 if I can, though I'll be > > > amazed if I can get beyond 7500. Don't need no stinkin' P-Port for > > > these rpms :-) > > > > > > > > > Times New Roman > > > > > > > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000On > > > the fuel spreadsheet that I posted (stolen) the other day, it gives a > > > HP figure for the flywheel, and rear wheels. The estimate for > > > the power loss due to a manual trans and diff is 15% on this > > > spreadsheet. Anyone know what this amounts to for our redrive, and > > > prop? > > > > > > > > > Times New Roman > > > > > > > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000Cheers, > > > or> > > > > > > > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000Rusty > > > (hoping Ed out types me) > > > > > > > > > Times New Roman > > > > > > > > > ArialFFFF,0000,0000 > > > fontfamily> > > > > > > > > > < > > >=20 --=20 http://www.bob-white.com N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)