|
|
Oh, right, Leon. Poor guy. He must have quite a headache by now. I
was afraid your new cowling had come loose, but then you would have the
<g>.
Too late. I've already ordered the WP337. (It's cheaper to get two
AN12 adapters than a new WP91.) Meziere lists the pumps as having a
MTBF of 10,000 hrs. If they aren't any farther off on that than they
are on their flow and current specs, I shouldn't have to worry about
the EWP any more than the standard EGWP. Bob W.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 07:49:02 -0600
"Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Cheers,
> Rusty (thud, thud, thud... what's that noise <g>)
What is that noise???
Bob W.
It's the sound of Leon beating his head against his desk :-)
If I were you, I wouldn't give up on the dual pump setup so quickly. Having
a redundant pump is one of the main reasons to use the EWP. There's also
every reason to believe (for those who are willing to believe) that the flow
rates you're getting with the dual pumps will be just fine. As Jim pointed
out, my 2 gallons of coolant cycles through the entire system in pretty
short order with most any flow rate that we're talking about. That really
put it in perspective for me.
Cheers,
Rusty
Mazda 13B rotary powered RV-3 (flying)
Kolb Slingshot (Mazda single rotor project)
Sonerai-IIL (next project in line)
--
http://www.bob-white.com
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)
|
|