Return-Path: <canarder@frontiernet.net>
Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.164] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 764002 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 00:00:02 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.164; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net
Received: from filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.76])
	by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCA93643D5
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Tue,  1 Mar 2005 04:59:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.164])
	by filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.76]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id 15590-05-40 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
	Tue, 1 Mar 2005 04:59:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-89-39.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.89.39])
	by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BDA3643C4
	for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Tue,  1 Mar 2005 04:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4223F69F.7030202@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:59:11 -0600
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Filterr or not to Filter: [FlyRotary] Re: FW:
 Cooling system update
References: <list-763348@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-763348@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0508-4, 02/27/2005), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net

That should work. All this scale and crap is a whole new issue I hadn't 
thought about until now.
I'll bet my core will need some SERIOUS cleaning out to feel safe around 
this ... Jim S.

Mark R Steitle wrote:

> Jim,
>
> For a “quick and dirty” experiment I think I’ll try putting a 
> stainless steel pot-scrubber pad into my swirl pot and see what it 
> looks like after an hour of running. This is a bypass system, so I 
> won’t be inhibiting flow to the engine. I wish this had come up before 
> I first ran my engine.
>
> Mark S.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] 
> *On Behalf Of *Mark R Steitle
> *Sent:* Monday, February 28, 2005 2:41 PM
> *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft
> *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: Filterr or not to Filter: [FlyRotary] Re: 
> FW: Cooling system update
>
>Ed,
>
>I’m with Tracy (use high quality glycol & distilled water), except for some possible RTV that might break free and get stuck in one or more of the radiator tubes.  Seems a good backflush would remedy that.  Next time I have my cooling system apart I might take a peek inside the radiator and see if there is anything blocking the tubes.  Corrective action would depend on what I find.  It wouldn’t take very many blocked tubes to push some of us over the edge.  
>
> 
>
>Mark S. 
>
>     
>
> Perhaps we could fashion a quickly removable filter and patch it into 
> various systems for a while just to check what it picks up.
> Like, I wouldn't have thought it possible to block up a whole damned 
> radiator ... Jim S.
>
> 
>
>Ed A
>
> 
>
>  
>
> 
>
>  
>
>>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
>
>>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>  
>