Return-Path: Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 759533 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:13:33 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.165; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.75]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ECD37007D for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165]) by filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.75]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14968-07-31 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (67-137-89-39.dsl2.cok.tn.frontiernet.net [67.137.89.39]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF363705D1 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <421F78AE.4020309@frontiernet.net> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:12:46 -0600 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: fuel flow References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0508-3, 02/25/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter08.roc.ny.frontiernet.net 
<... introduce a new wrinkle ...>
Not really new.  Solve that little issue with what is really the best design.  To wit:
Draw from Right wing (via sump if you like)
Return to Right wing (run return pretty far outboard - at least past the first baffle)
Have a Facet transfer from Left wing to Right wing.
Put a one or two minute timer on transfer pump if you like to prevent forgetting it and overflowing right tank (I plan to have 3-pos xfer switch ON - OFF - Momentary ON so that I have a choice of timer controlled or pilot controlled transfer.  It has the additional (very important IMO) feature of being able to transfer Left tank bone dry.  I am a lot more comfortable late in the flight knowing that every drop of gas on board is in the SELECTED tank.

Go ahead - ask my why I feel so strongly about that :o) ... Jim S.


Dale Rogers wrote:
Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net> wrote:

  
We've already discussed this too much - it's all been said more 
than once ... Jim S.
    

Jim,

   Indeed it has ... but you did introduce a new wrinkle 
(for me, anyway - and I've been on the list, what, three 
years?): the concern about pumping air from a "dry" tank 
into the fuel rail.  Since my fuel system, when I get that 
far, is pretty much like the Parmalee system,

     http://www.marcnadine.com/Menu.html

and I planned to use "both" on takeoff and landing, this 
is some concern to me.  

   It's defininely something I want to experiment with on 
my test cell.

Dale R.
COZY MkIV #1254



  
 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html