Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.165; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net
Message-ID: <421F43AA.20704@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:26:34 -0600
From: Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock
References: <list-758601@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-758601@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<... shouldn't "T" them Jim, rather bring them both out side-by-side ...>
I've never quite understood how that can be important (BTW, in the line 
from the "T" to outside, there's a check valve that will vent to cabin 
air in case some critter takes up residence in the end of the vent and 
stops it up.
Forgot to mention that ... Jim S.

WRJJRS@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 2/24/2005 8:47:37 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
> canarder@frontiernet.net writes:
>
>     My 3/8" vents follow identical paths from the tank up to the top
>     of the
>     firewall and "T" into a 3/8" Al tube that goes down and out the belly
>     and bends forward into the wind.  No blockages in the vent
>     (remember the
>     gravity feed tests that wouldn't have drained the same had there
>     been a
>     stopped up vent)?
>     No, the vents are the very first thing I looked at ... Jim S.
>
> shouldn't "T" them Jim, rather bring them both out side-by-side.
> Bill Jepson