Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 756191 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:23:39 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2005 13:22:51 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Received: from [172.18.179.151] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.151]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j1NIMlhF011678 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:22:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <421CC9F9.6040006@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:22:49 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Motorcycle generators References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Do you know the diameter of this unit, and the thickness? I do > think the idea is the best I've heard, but it might take a custom > built unit to do this. I would bet we could get someone to build > one, since everyone who's purchased one of Tracy's drives could > use it, and would probably want to. > > Cheers, > Rusty (the network guy today) > > We should not overlook the disadvantage of PM alternators. At > higher operating speed, the not used output will have to be > dissipated. This is the main reason why automotive alternators are > regulated by the exitation system. > FWIW. > > Richard Sohn > N-2071U > Rusty, I was looking late last night, but 1" thick comes to mind. Extrapolating from the pictures, I would guess about 6" in diameter? On the gearbox I have, it should be a comfortable fit, even with a few bolts sticking out. With a little luck, the stator could easily be situated to fit over any bolts. I'm pretty sure the effects of any induced eddy currents will be insignificant. (There I go guess again.) But a couple of solid rivets will be plenty enough to hold the rotor, and the center splines could be turned of in a lathe with a 1" bit quickly enough. And now that we have Bill saying that we won't have to rewind the coils, this just looks to easy. Richard, that is what I thought. I was wrong, but you may not be 8*) The old regulators dumped the excess current to ground through a resistor. The newer ones (like 1970 is new), just block the excess electrons. In my mind, I picture them loading up like a spring until the motive force of the magnets pass, when they then unload, releasing their energy and doing absolutely nothing.