Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-04.texas.rr.com ([24.93.47.43] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 742323 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:28:26 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.93.47.43; envelope-from=clouduster@austin.rr.com Received: from [10.0.0.99] (cs70113213-129.austin.rr.com [70.113.213.129]) by ms-smtp-04.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j1H3ReJ5005087 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:27:41 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <42140EFD.2020104@austin.rr.com> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:26:53 -0600 From: Dennis Haverlah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Vapor Lock References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050408010109070604030007" X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050408010109070604030007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Without a Facet pump between the tank and the HP and you have a vapor lock at the HP pump you will have no flow. With the Facet at the tank it will prime the HP pump by pushing liquid fuel into the HP pump. Once the vapor lock is gone, the HP can suck through the Facet even when it is running. How much flow is really coming out of an HP pump with a normal FI system with a return to the tank. I doubt is it 30 + gph. I guess I's saying the HP pump will be operating at much less than its max. rated capacity and the system with the Facet between the tank and the HP pump should work fine. I'm considering this system for my RV 7A. Dennis H. Jim Sower wrote: > <... HP pumps are capable of moving LOTS more fuel than a Facet pump > ... HP pumps would be drawing fuel through the Facet pump ... because > the Facet can't keep up ...> > > You're right. I hadn't thought of that. Facet pumps deliver 30 gph. > I'll check how much my HP pumps are putting out. Wonder if Facet > delivers more at lower head pressure, objective being to push fuel > through filter and plumbing so there's less chance of pressure drop > that could cause the fuel to vaporize. > > Back to the drawing board ... maybe ... Jim S. > > Marvin Kaye wrote: > >> Jim Sower wrote: >> >> """ >> I have a canard, but I will have a Facet pump near (and below) the >> wing tanks >> to PUSH the fuel through the filter and fuel flow transducer. I >> don't want >> the HP pumps to SUCK through the filters and etc. for fear of >> vaporizing the >> fuel. >> """ >> >> This doesn't make any sense to me, but perhaps I'm missing >> something. The HP pumps are capable of moving LOTS more fuel than a >> Facet pump. Consequently, it seems to me that the HP pumps would >> actually be drawing fuel through the Facet pump when they're switched >> on, simply because the Facet can't keep up with what's being drawn >> out of the sump tank by them. Additionally, a return system needs 2 >> flow transducers, one for the feed line and one for the return... >> then the display instrument's electronics deduct the return flow from >> the feed flow to properly calculate actual through-the-injectors >> instantaneous flow data. (The EI fuel flow instrument uses an FFDM-1 >> (fuel flow differential module) to do the job, GRT EIS does it >> itself, as do other flow instruments with both feed and return inputs.) >> >> As long as the filters are rated to flow as much fuel as the HP pumps >> are capable of pushing I don't see that (vapoization) as an issue. >> The filter elements do need to be kept clean, and are a >> replace-at-annual item. >> >> >> >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >>> >>> >> >> > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >> > --------------050408010109070604030007 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Without a Facet pump between the tank and the HP and you have a vapor lock at the HP pump you will have no flow.  With the Facet at the tank it will prime the HP pump by pushing  liquid fuel into the HP pump.  Once the vapor lock is gone, the HP can suck through the Facet even when it is running.  How much flow is really coming out of an HP pump with a normal FI system with a return to the tank.  I doubt is it 30 + gph.  I guess I's saying the HP pump will be operating at much less than its max. rated capacity and the system with the Facet between the tank and the HP pump should work fine.  I'm considering this system for my RV 7A.

Dennis H.

Jim Sower wrote:
<... HP pumps are capable of moving LOTS more fuel than a Facet pump ... HP pumps would be drawing fuel through the Facet pump ... because the Facet can't keep up ...>

You're right.  I hadn't thought of that.  Facet pumps deliver 30 gph.  I'll check how much my HP pumps are putting out.  Wonder if Facet delivers more at lower head pressure, objective being to push fuel through filter and plumbing so there's less chance of pressure drop that could cause the fuel to vaporize.

Back to the drawing board ... maybe ... Jim S.

Marvin Kaye wrote:

Jim Sower <canarder@frontiernet.net> wrote:

"""
 I have a canard, but I will have a Facet pump near (and below) the wing tanks
to PUSH the fuel through the filter and fuel flow transducer.  I don't want
the HP pumps to SUCK through the filters and etc. for fear of vaporizing the
fuel.
"""

This doesn't make any sense to me, but perhaps I'm missing something.  The HP pumps are capable of moving LOTS more fuel than a Facet pump.  Consequently, it seems to me that the HP pumps would actually be drawing fuel through the Facet pump when they're switched on, simply because the Facet can't keep up with what's being drawn out of the sump tank by them.  Additionally, a return system needs 2 flow transducers, one for the feed line and one for the return... then the display instrument's electronics deduct the return flow from the feed flow to properly calculate actual through-the-injectors instantaneous flow data.  (The EI fuel flow instrument uses an FFDM-1 (fuel flow differential module) to do the job, GRT EIS does it itself, as do other flow instruments with both feed and return inputs.)

As long as the filters are rated to flow as much fuel as the HP pumps are capable of pushing I don't see that (vapoization) as an issue.  The filter elements do need to be kept clean, and are a replace-at-annual item.

   <Marv>

 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html




 Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html

--------------050408010109070604030007--