Return-Path: Received: from mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.195] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP-TLS id 721317 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:29:23 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.195; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-31-115-158.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.115.158]) by mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j195Rk7e027689 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:27:47 +1100 Message-ID: <004701c50e68$635994d0$9e731fd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Bad day at the airport - Ellison Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:29:55 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01C50EBC.34B93280" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01C50EBC.34B93280 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message Jerry Hey is having problems posting to the group - any suggestions or = help he would appreciate! George ( down under) Rusty, Those sizes are what Jerry is running for his PP and should be fine = i.e. 2 of them. George ( down under) apparently a small number of CozyMKIV flyers are using the Ellison = on their 360's, (Nat, Steve Wright, David Dormier, Marc Zeitlin, and at = least one or two more). My understanding is that even the motor on = Paul's bench wouldn't produce more (or much more) power than the 360. = How can the 360's produce their power if that bore-size is an issue? = =20 Hi Tom, I can't say I understand it, but maybe Ken or someone will jump in = and bail me out. I gave up on the idea of using an Ellison when I = realized that the EFS-4-5 (180-225 HP) model only has a 1-7/8" bore. = I've been worried that I was on the verge of choking my 13B with "only" = 1-5/8" bores for each rotor. Now I suppose you could connect the = runners for both rotors together at a common plenum, and feed it with a = single1-7/8" bore since both rotors aren't requiring a huge airflow at = the same time. That seems like it should work, and I'd love to see = someone try it. Just hard to step back from true fuel injection. =20 Cheers, Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01C50EBC.34B93280 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
 
Jerry Hey is having problems posting = to the=20 group - any suggestions or help he would appreciate!
George ( down under)
 
Rusty,
Those sizes are what Jerry is running = for his PP=20 and should be fine i.e.
2 of them.
George ( down under)
apparently a small number of CozyMKIV flyers are=20 using the Ellison on their 360's,  (Nat, Steve = Wright, David=20 Dormier, Marc Zeitlin, and at least one or two more).  My = understanding=20 is that even the motor on Paul's bench wouldn't = produce more (or=20 much more) power than the 360.   How can the=20 360's produce their power if that bore-size is an=20 issue?        
 
Hi=20 Tom,
 
I can't=20 say I understand it, but maybe Ken or someone will jump in and bail = me=20 out.  I gave up on the idea of using an Ellison when I realized = that=20 the EFS-4-5 (180-225 HP) model only has a 1-7/8" bore.  I've = been=20 worried that I was on the verge of choking my 13B with "only" 1-5/8" = bores=20 for each rotor.  Now I suppose you could connect the = runners for=20 both rotors together at a common plenum, and feed it with a=20 single1-7/8" bore since both rotors aren't requiring a huge = airflow at=20 the same time.  That seems like it should work, and I'd = love to=20 see someone try it.  Just hard to step back from true fuel=20 injection.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty=20 =    
------=_NextPart_000_0044_01C50EBC.34B93280--