Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 721001 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:48:05 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristl@cisco.com Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2005 18:46:37 -0500 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Received: from [172.18.179.151] (echristl-linux.cisco.com [172.18.179.151]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j18NkYhF009370 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:46:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <42094F5A.3080706@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 18:46:34 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: new adapter plate References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit George Lendich wrote: >Ernest, > >Firstly springs in a clutch plate aren't much good for torsional >vibrations -try the Tracy Crook method. > > I will look into that. >Secondly how do you intend to attach your counter weight to the flexplate - >I guess I'm al ittle confused at what your doing there. > >George ( down under) > > That is why I left the backside of the clutch material on (what IS the proper name for that stuff?). It serves as a spacer between the clutch plate and the flex plate. The picture of the back of the assembling shows that there is sufficient room for the flex plate to counter weight bolts.